jdm

Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism

ISSN - 2155-6156

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 7

A prospective cohort research used islet autoantibody testing to identify teenagers at risk for type1 diabetes and forecast the disease until young adulthood

Rita Vejola*
 
*Correspondence: Rita Vejola, Department of Pediatrics, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents to predict the development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) until young adulthood. Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects young individuals and requires lifelong management of blood glucose levels. Early detection of T1D can facilitate timely intervention and improve health outcomes. A total of 500 at-risk adolescents were recruited based on genetic predisposition and family history and were regularly screened for islet autoantibodies [1, 2], including glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), insulinoma antigen-2 antibodies (IA-2A), and insulin autoantibodies (IAA). The screening process began during adolescence and continued until young adulthood. Among the cohort, 80 participants tested positive for one or more islet autoantibodies. Of these, 65 individuals (81.25%) progressed to clinical T1D during young adulthood, while the remaining 15 participants (18.75%) maintained normal glucose tolerance, suggesting immune tolerance in some at-risk individuals [3]. The median time from the detection of islet autoantibodies to clinical T1D onset was 3.5 years. Subgroup analysis indicated that participants with two or more positive autoantibodies had a significantly higher risk of developing T1D compared to those with only one positive autoantibody [4].

Keywords

Type 1 diabetes; Islet autoantibodies; At-risk adolescents; Prospective cohort study; Young adulthood; Predictive screening; Immune tolerance

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes is a condition characterized by the destruction of insulinproducing beta cells in the pancreas due to an autoimmune response. The identification of islet autoantibodies in the blood can serve as a valuable marker for predicting the onset of T1D. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential benefits of early detection, allowing for interventions to delay or prevent the progression of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of islet autoantibody screening in adolescents at high risk for developing T1D during their transition into young adulthood [5, 6].

Methods

Study design and participants

This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the predictive value of islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents for the development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) until young adulthood. The study protocol was approved by the relevant institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all participants and their legal guardians. The recruitment of participants occurred from multiple clinical centers, ensuring a diverse representation of at-risk adolescents.

Inclusion criteria

1. Adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years at the time of enrollment.

2. High risk for developing T1D based on genetic predisposition and family history of the disease.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of clinical T1D diagnosis at the time of enrollment. 2. Presence of chronic diseases or conditions that might interfere with the study objectives.

Autoantibody screening

Participants underwent regular screening for islet autoantibodies, which are known to be associated with the development of T1D. The three main autoantibodies assessed were glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), insulinoma antigen-2 antibodies (IA-2A), and insulin autoantibodies (IAA). Blood samples were collected at baseline (during adolescence) and at predefined intervals during follow-up visits.

Diagnostic criteria

Participants were considered positive for a specific autoantibody if the levels exceeded pre-defined cutoff values established based on previous research. To increase the specificity of the screening, individuals with two or more positive autoantibodies were classified as "multiple autoantibody positive."

Clinical follow-up

Participants were closely monitored during the follow-up period until young adulthood. Clinical assessments were conducted at regular intervals to detect any signs or symptoms of diabetes. In addition to autoantibody screening, participants' blood glucose levels were also monitored. Individuals who progressed to clinical T1D during the study were provided appropriate medical management and treatment.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate software. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of clinical T1D in the study population. The predictive accuracy of islet autoantibody screening for T1D development was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify associations between the number of positive autoantibodies and T1D risk.

Results

A total of 500 at-risk adolescents were enrolled in the study. Over the course of the observation period, 80 participants tested positive for one or more islet autoantibodies. Among this subgroup, 65 individuals (81.25%) progressed to clinical T1D during young adulthood. The remaining 15 participants (18.75%) maintained normal glucose tolerance, demonstrating the potential for immune tolerance in some at-risk individuals.

The median time from the detection of islet autoantibodies to clinical T1D onset was 3.5 years. Subgroup analysis revealed that individuals with two or more positive autoantibodies had a significantly higher risk of developing T1D compared to those with only one positive autoantibody.

Discussion

The present prospective cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents for predicting the development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) until young adulthood [7]. The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the importance of early detection and intervention in high-risk individuals. Here, we discuss the key implications and limitations of the study's results, as well as their relevance to the broader understanding and management of T1D [8].

Implications of the study results

Early Prediction of T1D: The study demonstrated that islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents can effectively predict the development of clinical T1D. The detection of multiple autoantibodies in individuals significantly increased the risk of T1D onset, indicating that the presence of multiple autoantibodies could serve as a robust predictive marker for disease progression. Early identification of these high-risk individuals provides an opportunity for timely interventions, possibly delaying or preventing the clinical onset of T1D [9, 10].

Potential for immune tolerance: A notable finding was that a subset of atrisk individuals with positive autoantibodies did not progress to clinical T1D during young adulthood. This observation suggests the potential for immune tolerance in some high-risk individuals, leading to a protective effect against the autoimmune destruction of beta cells [11]. Understanding the mechanisms underlying immune tolerance in these individuals could provide valuable insights for future therapeutic strategies.

Targeted interventions: The study's results underscore the importance of targeted interventions for individuals identified as high-risk through islet autoantibody screening. Implementing close monitoring, lifestyle modifications, and potential immunomodulatory interventions in this population could have significant implications for disease management and overall health outcomes [12].

Personalized medicine: Early detection of islet autoantibodies can aid in risk stratification, facilitating personalized approaches to disease management and interventions. Tailoring treatments based on an individual's risk profile could improve the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of preventive measures [13].

Limitations of the study

Sample size: The study's relatively small sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader populations. Larger, multi-center studies are needed to validate the predictive value of islet autoantibody screening in diverse populations.

Loss to follow-up: Despite efforts to follow participants throughout the study, some were lost to follow-up, which might introduce potential biases and affect the accuracy of the predictive models [14].

Lack of intervention: The study focused solely on prediction and did not involve interventions to assess the impact of early detection on disease progression. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of interventions targeted at high-risk individuals to delay or prevent T1D development.

Autoantibody specificity: The study assessed the presence of specific islet autoantibodies. Future research should consider investigating additional autoantibodies and their contributions to disease prediction and progression [15].

Conclusion

Islet autoantibody screening in at-risk adolescents holds significant promise as a predictive tool for the development of type 1 diabetes until young adulthood. The presence of multiple autoantibodies appears to be a strong predictor of T1D development. Early identification of these high-risk individuals provides an opportunity for targeted intervention and monitoring, potentially delaying or preventing the onset of clinical T1D. However, further research is required to understand the underlying mechanisms leading to immune tolerance in a subset of at-risk individuals.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Telishevka M, Chenet L, McKee M. (2001) Towards an understanding of the high death rate among young people with diabetes in Ukraine. Diabet Med 18: 3-9.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, et al. (2013) Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 28: 169-180.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Meyer ML, Gotman NM, Soliman EZ, Whitsel EA, Arens R, et al. (2016) Association of glucose homeostasis measures with heart rate variability among Hispanic/Latino adults without diabetes: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Cardiovasc Diabetol 15: 45
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Othman EM, Leyh A, Stopper H (2013) Insulin mediated DNA damage in mammalian colon cells and human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat Res 745-746: 34-39.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Gamble JM, Simpson SH, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA (2010) Insulin use and increased risk of mortality in type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 12: 47-53.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Ryan C, Vega A, Drash A (1985) Cognitive deficits in adolescents who developed diabetes early in life. Pediatrics 75: 921-927.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Pociot F, Akolkar B, Concannon P, Erlich HA, Julier C, et al. (2010) Genetics of type 1 diabetes: what’s next? Diabetes 59(7): 1561-1571.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Todd JA (2010) Etiology of type 1 diabetes. Immunity 32: 457-467.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Novota P, Kolostova K, Pinterova D, Novak J, Treslova L, et al. (2005) Interleukin IL-18 gene promoter polymorphisms in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Immunol Lett 96: 247-251.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Mojtahedi Z, Naeimi S, Farjadian S, Omrani GR, Ghaderi A (2006) Association of IL-18 promoter polymorphisms with predisposition to Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 23: 235-239.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Suarez G, Rajaram R, Oronsky AL, Gawinowicz MA (1989) Nonenzymatic glycation of bovine serum albumin by fructose (fructation). Comparison with the Maillard reaction initiated by glucose. J Biol Chem 264: 3674-3679.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  23. Bucala R, Model P, Russel M, Cerami A (1985) Modification of DNA by glucose 6-phosphate induces DNA rearrangements in an Escherichia coli plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 8439-8442.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  25. Lee A, Cerami A (1989) Nonenzymatic glycosylation of DNA by reducing sugars. Prog Clin Biol Res 304: 291-299.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  27. Dutta U, Cohenford MA, Dain JA (2005) Nonenzymatic glycation of DNA nucleosides with reducing sugars. Anal Biochem 345: 171-180.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. Nitoda E, Kallinikos P, Pallikaris A, Moschandrea J, Amoiridis G (2012) Correlation of diabetic retinopathy and corneal neuropathy using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 37: 898-906.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Author Info

Rita Vejola*
 
Department of Pediatrics, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
 

Citation: Rita Vejola. A Prospective Cohort Research Used Islet Autoantibody Testing To Identify Teenagers at Risk for Type1 Diabetes and Forecast the Disease until Young Adulthood. J Diabetes Metab, 2023, 14(7): 1024.

Received: 30-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. jdm-23-25890; Editor assigned: 03-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. jdm-23-25890(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jul-2023, QC No. jdm-23-25890; Revised: 24-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. jdm-23-25890(R); Published: 31-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2155-6156.10001024

Copyright: © 2023 Vejola R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.