jdm

Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism

ISSN - 2155-6156

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 6

Determinants of Glycaemic Control Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Testing a Process Model Based on Self-Determination Theory

Amilia Krastad*
 
*Correspondence: Amilia Krastad, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies Vei 72, Norway, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance and high blood glucose levels. Achieving and maintaining optimal glycaemic control is essential in managing T2D and preventing complications. However, many patients with T2D struggle to achieve target glycaemic levels despite the availability of effective treatments and interventions. Understanding the determinants of glycaemic control is crucial for developing targeted strategies to improve diabetes management. This article aims to examine the determinants of glycaemic control among patients with T2D using a process model based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) [1-5].

Self-Determination Theory is a psychological framework that explores the motivation behind human behavior and its impact on self-regulation and wellbeing. According to SDT, three psychological needs drive human motivation: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Applying SDT to the context of T2D management, this study investigates how these psychological needs and their fulfillment influence patients' self-regulation processes and, consequently, their ability to achieve optimal glycaemic control [6- 9].

Methodology

Participant recruitment

Patients diagnosed with T2D were recruited from healthcare clinics or hospitals.

Informed consent was obtained from participants prior to their involvement in the study.

Data collection

Measures of glycaemic control (e.g., HbA1c levels) were collected from medical records.

Questionnaires assessing psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness), self-regulation, diabetes-related self-care behaviors, and sociodemographic factors were administered to participants.

Development and testing of the process model

The collected data were used to test a process model based on SDT, examining the relationships between psychological needs, self-regulation processes, self-care behaviors, and glycaemic control.

Structural equation modeling or other appropriate statistical analyses were conducted to assess the fit of the proposed model and the significance of the relationships between variables [10- 12].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and glycaemic control levels.

Correlation analyses or regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between psychological needs, self-regulation processes, selfcare behaviors, and glycaemic control outcomes.

Mediation or moderation analyses may be conducted to explore the role of self-regulation processes in mediating or moderating the relationships between psychological needs, self-care behaviors, and glycaemic control [13, 14].

Ethical considerations

The study adhered to ethical guidelines and obtained necessary approvals from relevant ethics committees or institutional review boards.

Results and Discussion

The results section will present the findings of the statistical analyses and their implications for understanding the determinants of glycaemic control among patients with T2D. It may include information on the associations between psychological needs, self-regulation processes, self-care behaviors, and glycaemic control outcomes. The discussion will focus on the theoretical and practical implications of the results, highlighting the potential role of psychological needs and self-regulation in improving diabetes management and informing intervention strategies [15].

Conclusion

Understanding the determinants of glycaemic control among patients with T2D is crucial for optimizing diabetes management and patient outcomes. By applying a process model based on Self-Determination Theory, this study aims to provide insights into the influence of psychological needs and selfregulation processes on self-care behaviors and glycaemic control outcomes.

The findings have the potential to inform the development of targeted interventions that enhance patient motivation, self-regulation, and adherence to self-care behaviors, ultimately leading to improved glycaemic control and better overall diabetes management.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  1. Barnard K, Thomas S, Royle P (2010) Fear of hypoglycaemia in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 10: 50.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Mattila TK, de Boer A (2010) Influence of intensive versus conventional glucose control on microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 70: 2229-2245.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Ly TT, Gallego PH, Davis EA (2009) Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in a population-based sample of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32: 1802-1806.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. American Diabetes Association (2013) Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care 36: 6-11.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Kumar A, Arora A, Sharma P, Anikhindi SA, Bansal N, et al. (2020) Reply to the letter of Singh and Singh in response to the article: "Is diabetes mellitus associated with mortality and severity of COVID-19? A meta-analysis". Diabetes Metab Synd 14 (5): 1147-1148.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Kumar A, Arora A, Sharma P, Anikhindi SA, Bansal N, et al. (2020) Is diabetes mellitus associated with mortality and severity of COVID-19? A meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Synd 14(4): 535-545.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Lopez-Bastida J, Boronat M, Moreno JO, Schurer W. (2020) Costs, outcomes and challenges for diabetes care in Spain. Glob Health: 9.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Tsiachristas A, Dikkers C, Boland MRS, Rutten-van Molken MPMH (2013) Exploring payment schemes used to promote integrated chronic care in Europe. Health Policy 113(3): 296-304.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, et al. (1998) Prevalence of insulin resistance in metabolic disorders: the Bruneck Study. Diabetes 47: 1643-1649.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Reaven GM (1988) Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37: 1595-1607.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  21. Abdul-Ghani MA, DeFronzo RA (2009) Pathophysiology of prediabetes. Curr Diab Rep 9: 193-199.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  23. Ausk KJ, Boyko EJ, Ioannou GN (2010) Insulin resistance predicts mortality in nondiabetic individuals in the U.S. Diabetes care 33:1179-1185.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  25. Pociot F, Akolkar B, Concannon P, Erlich HA, Julier C, et al. (2010) Genetics of type 1 diabetes: what’s next? Diabetes 59(7): 1561-1571.
  26. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  27. Swift PG (2009) Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 10: 51-57.
  28. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  29. Brink S, Laffel L, Likitmaskul S (2009) Sick day management in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 12: 146-153.
  30. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Author Info

Amilia Krastad*
 
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies Vei 72, Norway
 

Citation: Amilia Krastad. Determinants of Glycaemic Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Testing a Process Model Based On Self- Determination Theory. J Diabetes Metab, 2023, 14(6): 1012.

Received: 30-May-2023, Manuscript No. jdm-23-25153; Editor assigned: 02-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. jdm-23-25153(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Jun-2023, QC No. jdm-23-25153; Revised: 23-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. jdm-23-25153(R); Published: 30-Jun-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2155-6156.10001012

Copyright: © 2023 Krastad A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.