ijddr

International Journal of Drug Development and Research

ISSN - 0975-9344

- (2011) Volume 3, Issue 4

Application of TLC- Densitometry, First Derivative and Ratio Derivative Spectrophotometry for the Determination of Eprosartan Mesylate and Hydrochlorothiazide in Pharmaceutical Preparation

 

Author info »

Abstract

Three sensitive and accurate methods are described for the direct determination of eprosartan mesylate (EPM) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in bulk powder and combined dosage form without prior separation. The first method is a first derivative spectrophotometry (1D) using a zerocrossing technique of measurement at 240.7 nm for EPM and at 233.4 nm for HCT. The second method is the first derivative of ratio spectrophotometry (1DD) where the amplitudes were measured at 237.0 nm for EPM and at 277.0 nm for HCT. The third method is based on TLC separation of the two drugs followed by densitometric measurements of their spots at 290 and 270 nm for EPM and HCT, respectively. The separation was carried out on silica gel 60 F254 using n-butyl acetate-ethanol-waterammonia 33% (40:40:10:1, v/v/v/v) as mobile phase. The calibration curves were linear in the range 1.0-18.0, 2.0- 18.0 μg mL-1 and 2.0-20.0 μg/spot for EPM and 1.0-9.0, 1.0-9.0 μg mL-1 and 2.0-9.0 μg/ spot for HCT using 1D, 1DD and TLC methods, respectively. The suggested methods were tested using laboratory-prepared mixtures and were successfully applied for the analysis of pharmaceutical preparations. The methods retained their accuracy and precision when the standard addition technique was applied. The results obtained by applying the proposed methods were statistically analyzed and compared with those obtained by the manufacturer’s and USP methods for EPM and HCT, respectively.

References

  1. S. Hillaert, T.R.M. De Beer, J.O. De Beer, W. Van den Bossche, J. Chromatogr. A, 984, 135 (2003).
  2. S. Hillaert, W. Van den Bossche., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 31, 329 (2003).
  3. D. E. Lundberg, C. R. Person, S. Knox, M. J. Cyronak., J. Chromatogr. B, 707, 328 (1998).
  4. N. Ferreiros, G. Iriarte, R. M. Alonso, R. M. Jimenez, E. Ortiz, J. Chromatogr. A, 1119, 309 (2006).
  5. N. Ferreiros, G. Iriarte, R. M. Alonso, R. M. Jimenez, Talanta, 69, 747 (2006).
  6. J. Joseph-Charles, S. Brault, C. Boyer, M.H. Langlois, L. Cabrero, J. P. Dubost, Anal. Lett., 36, 2485 (2003).
  7. S. A. Shah, I. S. Rathod, B. N. Suhagia, S.S. Savale, J. B. Patel, J. AOAC Inter., 84, 1715 (2001).
  8. E. Satana, S. Altinay, N. G. Goger, S. A. Ozkan, Z. Senturk, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 25, 1009 (2001).
  9. S. A. Özkan, S. Akay, S. Cevheroglu, Z. Sentürk, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol., 24, 869 (2001).
  10. G. Carlucci, G. Palumbo, P. Mazzeo, M. G. Quaglia, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 23, 185 (2000).
  11. M. G. Quaglia, E. Donati, G. Carlucci, P. Mazzeo, S. Fanali, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 29, 981 (2002).
  12. H.U. Patel, B.N. Suhagia, C.N. Patel, ActaChromatographica, 21, 319 (2009).
  13. A. El-Gindy, B. El-Zeany, T. Awad, M. M. Shaban, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 26, 203 (2001).
  14. B. Benger, in: Proceeding of the Six International Symposium on Instrumental planner Chromatography, Institute for Chromatography, Bad Duerkheim 1991, p. 291.
  15. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products. ICH Topic Q2B Note for Guidance on Validation of Analytical Procedure: Methodology GPMP/ICH/281/95, 1996.
  16. The United States Pharmacopoeia, 32, NF 27, United States Parmacopoeial Convention, INC, USA 2009, p. 2567.

Author Info

 

Copyright:This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.