acr

Reconstructive Surgery & Anaplastology

ISSN - 2161-1173

Review Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 2

Chronic Neck Pain Consideration in the Facelift Patient

Hani Sinno* and Leonard Miller
Division of Plastic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5A, Boston MA 02215, USA
*Corresponding Author: Hani Sinno, MD, MEng, FRCSC, Division of Plastic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5A, Boston MA 02215, USA, Tel: 1 (617) 632-7369, Fax: 1 (617) 632-7840 Email:

Abstract

With the aging population and concomitant increased prevalence of arthritis and pain, especially in the neck, special considerations should be considered during facelift surgery. Asymptomatic or undiagnosed neck arthritis can result in stiffness in the neck decreasing the mobility during surgery. This will not only hinder the surgeon’s visual field but also cause discomfort to the patient peri-operatively. We propose a rotating surgical bed with a separate head and neck mobility piece to protect the neck of the arthritic patient and the back of the surgeon.

Keywords: Facelift patient, MRI, Neck arthropathies

Introduction

Facelift surgery is a common procedure ranking amongst the top five most common cosmetic surgeries performed [1]. Its popularity continues to rise with a 5 % increase in procedural numbers from 2010 to 2011 [1]. Whether the procedure is performed under local or general anesthesia the neck must be rotated over 120 degrees in the sagittal plane to allow the surgeon to adequately visualize the dissection planes. Asymptomatic or undiagnosed neck arthritis can result in the inability to rotate the neck adequately during surgery. This will not only hinder the surgeon’s visual field but also cause discomfort to the patient perioperatively, (Figure 1). Aggressive rotation of the arthritic neck can even theoretically result in inadvertent injury to the cervical spine of the patient.

anaplastology-facelift-patient-surgeon

Figure 1: Schematic representation of a facelift patient on an operative table. The surgeon’s vision is represented by the circular eye with an arrow to the surgical field.

Cervical spondylosis (degenerative osteoarthritis) is likely more common in the facelift patients than previously expected. Facelift surgery comprises over 65% of cosmetic procedures performed in those aged over 55 years and over 33% of cosmetic procedures for those aged between 40 and 54 years [1]. Arthritis in the neck effect people in their 4th and 5th decade of life [2]. These degenerative changes in the neck increase with age in the general population [2,3]. In fact, the majority of patients are unaware of their neck arthritis. Studies of the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons have discovered that degenerative changes on MRI are present in 60% of persons older than 40 years [4]. In those individuals older than the age of 60, degenerative changes on cervical spine radiographs are present in more than 60% to 75% of persons [4]. On MRI this evidence was seen in more than 85% of persons [5,6]. No differences in abnormal findings were found between males and females [3]. The prevalence of positive MRI findings in asymptomatic individuals emphasizes the importance for pre-operative history and physical exams prior to cosmetic surgery of the face. Moreover, since the vast majority of patients undergoing facelift surgery fall within the age group of increased prevalence of cervical spondylosis, plastic surgeons are recommended to be mindful of this important but often silent condition

Aggressive mobility of the neck can expose the cervical spine to theoretical risk factors not seen in the general population [7]. This can occur during participation of sports or even facelift surgery. Some of these risk factors include body mechanics, repetitive loads, acute bony and ligamentous injuries, spondylolysis, and muscle imbalances [8-14]. During cosmetic facial surgery, the neck can be exposed to such stress and strain forces acting on the cervical bony and ligamentous constructs as well as the strap, sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. The prolonged positioning of the neck to each extreme rotational position during a facelift procedure can aggravate pre-existing spondylosis and result in painful spasm of the surrounding muscles.

Cervical spondylosis can be a predisposing condition leading to cervical radiculopathy. The latter is a neurologic condition that is featured by a dysfunction of a cervical spinal nerve and/or the roots of the nerve. It most commonly presents with pain in the neck and upper extremity. It can also present with a combination of changes in the sensory, motor, or reflexes in the affected nerve-root distribution [15]. Cervical radiculopathy has an annual incidence of 170 per 100,000. It peaks at 50 to 54 years of age [16]. A history of physical exertion or trauma precedes the onset of symptoms in only 15 percent of cases [16,17]. If the plastic surgeon suspects cervical radiculopathy, cosmetic surgery is recommended to be put on hold until adequate further neurologic evaluation and treatment is established.

For all facelift patients above 40 years of age, plastic surgeons are advised to continue to perform thorough history and physical exams with cervical spondylosis in mind. Any signs of stiffness or tenderness of the neck and upper extremity must be noted. The threshold for neurologic consultation in a high risk patient and follow-up should be low to prevent any inadvertent injury to the patient or intra-operative surprises. A surgical bed that has a rotatory setting in the sagittal plane is recommended, (Figure 2). A separate rotatory neck part on the table would also prove superior allowing a differential rotation of the neck from the rest of the body to improve surgical exposure and prevent the patient from sliding from the table, (Figure 3). This is especially true for the majority of the facelift patients who are likely to be within the 85 % of individuals with neck arthritis because of their age group [1,2]. Furthermore, this set-up would protect the surgeons’ own neck and back from developing discomfort and pain that may in itself exacerbate cervical spondylosis of their own.

anaplastology-facelift-operative-circular

Figure 2: Schematic representation of a facelift patient on a rotated operative table. The surgeon’s vision is represented by the circular eye with an arrow to the surgical field.

anaplastology-facelift-adjustable-neck

Figure 3: Schematic representation of a facelift patient on a rotated operative table with a separate adjustable neck rotation. The surgeon’s vision is represented by the circular eye with an arrow to the surgical field.

The type of anesthesia is another important consideration in older patients with suspected neck arthropathies. Local anesthesia will likely be inadequate to achieve full comfort for the patient and the surgeon during a prolonged facelift surgery on a patient with neck arthritis [18]. The patient will generally feel more pain and develop more stiffness throughout the case. We believe that general anesthesia will result in appropriate patient comfort during the surgical procedure. Unfortunately, in many of the aging patients requesting facelift surgery, other medical co-morbidities may preclude a general anesthetic. Under general anesthesia the surgeon may inadvertently hyper-extend or hyper-rotate the arthritic neck that may increase risk of acute injury and/or result in post-operative neck pain. Local anesthesia with light sedation is an adequate modality for this patient population [18,19]. If performed well, the patient will be comfortable during the procedure while preventing inadvertent injury to the skeletal-muscular unit of the neck [19].

Neck arthritis is common in the facelift patient cohort. Careful history and physical exam are recommended to adequately screen plastic surgery patients, especially in the setting of silent cervical spondylosis. Simple surgical table differential rotation settings can provide plastic surgeons with improve surgical field exposure and decrease risk and discomfort to the patients and themselves.

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2012) 2011 Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics.
  2. Radhika C, Kumar GV, Mihirjan K (2012) A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy of Nasya in reducing the signs and symptoms of cervical spondylosis. Ayu 33: 73-77.
  3. Lehto IJ, Tertti MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, et al. (1994) Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 36: 49-53.
  4. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72: 403-408.
  5. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM (1986) Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11: 521-524.
  6. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, et al. (1998) MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80: 19-24.
  7. Triantafillou KM, Lauerman W, Kalantar SB (2012) Degenerative disease of the cervical spine and its relationship to athletes. Clin Sports Med 31: 509-520.
  8. Gerbino PG, d'Hemecourt PA (2002) Does football cause an increase in degenerative disease of the lumbar spine? Curr Sports Med Rep 1: 47-51.
  9. Gatt CJ Jr, Hosea TM, Palumbo RC, Zawadsky JP (1997) Impact loading of the lumbar spine during football blocking. Am J Sports Med 25: 317-321.
  10. Micheli LJ (1983) Overuse injuries in children's sports: the growth factor. Orthop Clin North Am 14: 337-360.
  11. Watson AW (1995) Sports injuries in footballers related to defects of posture and body mechanics. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 35: 289-294.
  12. Tall RL, DeVault W (1993) Spinal injury in sport: epidemiologic considerations. Clin Sports Med 12: 441-448.
  13. Ikata T, Miyake R, Katoh S, Morita T, Murase M (1996) Pathogenesis of sports-related spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 24: 94-98.
  14. Semon RL, Spengler D (1981) Significance of lumbar spondylolysis in college football players. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6: 172-174.
  15. Bogduk N (2003) The anatomy and pathophysiology of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14: 455-472.
  16. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT (1994) Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 117: 325-335.
  17. Carette S, Fehlings MG (2005) Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med 353: 392-399.
  18. Ullmann Y, Levy Y, Isserles S, Vohradnik G (1999) Anesthesia for facial surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23: 296-297.
  19. Prendiville S, Weiser S (2009). Management of anesthesia and facility in facelift surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 17:531-538.
Citation: Sinno H, Miller L (2013) Chronic Neck Pain Consideration in the Facelift Patient. Anaplastology 2:110.

Copyright: © 2013 Sinno H, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.