Natural Products Chemistry & Research

ISSN - 2329-6836

Research Article - (2017) Volume 5, Issue 6

Gallium (III)-Metalloporphyrin Grafted Magnetite Nanoparticles for Fluoride Removal from Aqueous Solutions

Behnoosh Asgari1* and James Bowen2
1Islamic Azad University, Central Branch, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK
*Corresponding Author: Behnoosh Asgari, Islamic Azad University, Central Branch, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +982147911 Email:

Abstract

Fluoride is a critical micronutrient for human health and is usually ingested through food and drinking water. This technique has done in monitoring the concentration of fluoride in water complications at mining operation that it effects on the environment. Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized by coprecipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in an alkaline solution, their surface was then modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and a Ga(III) porphyrin complex, Ga(TCPP)Cl2[TCPP: tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin]. The morphology and physical properties of these modified magnetic nanoparticles were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The batch experiments showed that the nanoparticles could be used to remove fluoride ions from aqueous solution, achieving an extraction efficiency in excess of 96% for an initial fluoride concentration of 10 mg/L. This was obtained at pH 5.5 using 50 mg of modified nanoparticles and a contact time of 30 min.

Keywords: Fluoride ion; Metalloporphyrin; Magnetite; Nanoparticles; Wastewater treatment; Surface modification

Introduction

Fluoride in the environment happens through its natural existence on the earth's crust and industrial activities, especially electroplating, glass, steel, aluminum, and enricher industries. The discharge of such wastewater leads to the fluoride contamination of surface and ground water. The contamination of ground water with fluoride can occur naturally by the dissolution of fluoride rich minerals whereas artificial pollution occurs due to the waste water produced from mine, mental refining, plating industries, aluminum smelters and high-tech semiconductor factories [1-5]. Fluoride pollution of the industrial wastewater is one of the significant problems worldwide imposing a severe threat to human health [6]. This method has done in controlling the concentration of fluoride in water problems at mining operation that it effects on the environment. Mine water emanates from working and abandoned surface and underground mines. Usually, it is ground water percolating through the host rocks or sediments, collected by the shafts, galleries, or open pits. Although mine water is not necessarily contaminated, in many cases it contains elevated metal or acidity values which cause a severs threat to the receiving water courses and river catchments. Noncontaminated mine water is used for several purposes, e.g., as cooling water for power plants, drinking water, mineral water, or for agricultural purposes [7]. As an environmental element, fluoride has received much attention due to its both useful and harmful effect on health. For example, while low concentration of fluoride in drinking water can cause dental cavities, excess concentration in drinking water cause dental and skeletal fluorosis, indicating the importance of standardization of this element at a recommended range in drinking water was 1.5 mg/L by World Health Organization (WHO). In order to reduce the concentration of fluoride in water, various defluoridation technologies have been developed, including: viz., adsorption, ion exchange, precipitation and the membrane process such as reverse osmosis [8], Nano filtration [9], electro dialysis [10] and Donnan dialysis [11]. Adsorption is an efficient and common process in de-fluoridation of water, with satisfactory results and vast applications. Different sorbents have been investigated for removing fluoride, such as: active alumina [12], clay [13], activated carbon [14] and some other sorbents [15]. Recently, many studies have been concentrated on developing novel ionophores with useful specificity for anion [16]. For example, it is found that Gaoctaethyl porphyrin [OEP] [17,18] can be applied as a useful ionophore in producing membrane electrodes with significantly enhanced properties, such as favorable selectivity. In Ga(III)- metallophorphyrin, the main reason for enhanced selectivity of fluoride can be attributed to the strong interaction between fluoride anion and the Ga(III) cation available in the structure of metalloporphyrin. As building blocks, nanoparticles play an important role in producing nanomaterials, due to their small size, which gives them a high surface area-to-volume ratio, resulting in new magnetic, electrical and optical properties. Improving chemical reactivity is another significant effect of the large surface area of nanoparticles, which provides the possibility for chemical interactions with other chemical species that are available in the environment. There are other abilities for using of nanoparticles such as: adsorption and recovery of some ligands, dyes and ionic species, which are available in the literature [19-24]. The main specification of these nanosorbants, and one which can be considered as their main advantage, is their ability to recover nanoparticles using their external magnetic field. In the mentioned material, dipole/dipole attraction and agglomeration can be created as a basis and a passive layer; this is attributable to important capabilities like high chemical activity, their oxidation ability in air and the loss of magnetism. However, some operations, such as modification of post- synthetic surface are essential [25-31]. For coated metal oxides at the nanoscale, the most common modification method is aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES). However, nanomaterials lack the target-selective ability, which makes them a weak candidate for samples with complicated matrices. All of this indicates the necessity for functionalization as a tool for inducing selective targeting in nanomaterials [32-40]. For example, Ga-porphyrin is a useful ionophore which can be used in membrane electrodes [41,42]. In other words, it is possible to fabricate a new type of magnetic nanosorbent with high affinity toward fluoride and favorable magnetic reparability by combining the Ga(III) porphyrin and the magnetic nanoparticle. This paper investigates a new type of nanomagnet which is an APTES coated magnetite, functionalized with the Ga(III) tetra (4-carboxy phenyl) porphyrin dichloride are represented in Figure 1.

natural-products-chemistry-Schematic-depiction

Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the metalloporphyrin used in this work.

Experimental

Materials

The most important materials were ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2.4H2O), dichloromethane (DCM), Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3.6H2O), APTES, methanol, ethanol, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCHC), 4-paracarboxybenzaldehde, propynoyic acid, pyrrole, N, Ndimethylformamide (DMF), gallium acetate, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), sodium fluoride, sodium salts of indicated anions and deionized water in all experiments were graded analytically. Free basic tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) (Aldrich) was dried under vacuum at 60 0C before using Ga(TCPP)Cl2 was prepared using methods described in the literature [43,44].

Equipment

Morphology of the samples was investigated using TEM with Zeiss 900 and 80 KV voltage. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the solid produces in the 2θ range of 5-80º using a PW-1840 diffractometer were found from Philips Co. [45] with Cu κα radiation (λ=1.54178 Å). Thermogravimetric analysis was performed using a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA 851. Samples were heated under a static air atmosphere from ambient to 1000ºC at a rate of 10ºC/min. Ion chromatography (IC) determinations were carried out using a S1122 Sykam ion chromatograph. pH measurements were performed with a Denver Instrument Company 9710.1 pH meter kit UB-5. FT-IR spectra were recorded with a IFS 88 FT-IR spectrophotometer from Bruker Co., using a standard KBr pellet technique.

Sorbent preparation

Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Co-precipitation is known to be one of the best methods for synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, based on a study performed by Maity [45,46]. Using this method, 2 g FeCl2.4H2O and 5.2 g FeCl3.6H2O were used, with 25 mL deionized water added. The mixed solution was stirred under N2 at 80ºC for 1 h. 100 mL of aqueous 1.5 M NaOH was then injected into the mixture and stirred under N2 for 1 h. Next, precipitated particles were washed with deionized water three times in order to remove mineral salts; the solution was subsequently washed with ethanol three times to remove organic materials. In the next step precipitated particles were separated with magnets, and finally Fe3O4 nanoparticles were dried in an oven at 50ºC for 24 h.

Modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with APTES group: Fe3O4 / APTES nanoparticles were synthesized according to a previously described method [47,48]. This reaction was between APTES and a hydroxyl group on the surface of the magnetite available in the alkaline solution; the bond Fe-O-H changed with Fe-O-Si [49]. 2.3 g magnetic nanoparticles, were dispersed in 100 mL ethanol using a sonication method, for about 1 h; under continuous mechanical stirring, 20.34 mL APTES was added. This reaction was achieved for 20 h under N2 atmosphere. The Fe3O4 /APTES nanoparticles were prepared and separated with a magnet, and were washed with ethanol and deionized water three times. Finally, Fe3O4 /APTES nanoparticles were dried under vacuum at 70ºC.

Grafting of Ga(TCPP) group at the surface of Fe3O4 /APTES: The metalloporphyrin structure is designed to accept different ions, based on central metal and complex formation; the metalloporphyrin is used instead of pulling electron groups, which gathers them on nonminerals support, making them a good choice for separation and specific to ions [50]. 10 g paracarboxide benzaldehyde and 5 mL pyrrole, mixed in the bottom flask, were stirred under N2, followed by the addition of 250 mL propionic acid. The mixture was refluxed at 140ºC for 30 min. The product was filtered with filter papers that does not have disturbance in this reaction and this reaction has done under vacuum then allowed to cool to room temperature, washed with methanol, and then washed with deionized water at 70-80ºC. Finally, the product was dried under vacuum to absorb the acid from the substance. Increasing time of reaction does not have effect on reaction efficiency only purity of product get decreased. 2 g H2(TCPP) poured into balloon was stirred under N2. After adding 25 mL DMSO and 4.3 g Ga(III), acetate 4H2O, the mixture was refluxed at 130ºC for 6 h, it was allowed to cool for 6 h after stopping N2 to achieve separation, the solvent substance was vacuumed. The solid produce was washed in deionized water to separate and extract, and for additional purification the substance was next moved through a silica column with DMF and dried under vacuum at 120ºC [51]. 2 g Fe3O4/APTES nanoparticles with 0.247 g (DCHC) and 20 mL DMF were mixed under N2 atmosphere; 0.458 g Ga(TCPP) mixed in 5 mL DMF were added and were refluxed under N2 atmosphere at 140ºC for 8 h. A high flow of N2 was used to prevent decomposition of DMF during the reaction. The product was washed with DMF, DCM and methanol after reaction, until porphyrin with an electrostatic bond mixed with Fe3O4/APTES exited quickly and the product remained at 80ºC for 24 h, to be dried and extra solvent could be exhausted. DCHC was used as a catalyst for making the bond between COOH groups and NH2 groups on the magnetite surface (Figure 2).

natural-products-chemistry-Chemical-functionalization

Figure 2: Chemical functionalization magnetite surface using APTES followed by metalloporphyrin insertion. (APTES=3- aminopropyltriethoxysilane and DCHC=dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and TCPP=tetrakis (4-carboxyphenl) porphyrin).

Sorption procedure: Batch-sorption were performed by mixing 10 mL Fluoride aqueous solution (10.0 mg L-1) and various amounts (10-100 mg) dry powder of the Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanoparticles in using a sonication method for 30 min. then, the sorbent was separated before measurement, the Fluoride removal efficiency was calculated according to Equation (1) in the text:

Fluoride removal efficiency (%)=(C0-Cf)/C0 × 100 (1)

where C0 and Cf are the initial and final concentration of the fluoride ion, before and after the sorption, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of nanomagnets

XRD spectrum: Structure and particle size were determined by XRD, the crystalline structure of synthesized nanoparticles is shown in the XRD analysis. The Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) reference pattern of magnetite (No.19-629) is included for comparison. The XRD spectrum shows diffractions and the fact that Fe3O4 is available in the spinel phase. Existing peaks in (220), (311), (400), (511) and (411) indicate cubic spinel phases of Fe3O4. Fe3O4, is completely pure due to lack of any peaks in 20-30 For y-Fe2O3 [52], observation of peaks in the first section indicates synthesized magnetite; the second section shows modification of the magnetite surface and the third section is related to functionalization of the magnetite. All of the peaks in three parts are similar, indicating the stability of the crystalline phase of the nanoparticles. The results of the XRD analysis from the synthesized substance indicate the diameter of particles to be equal to 45 nm in histogram.

FT-IR spectrum: This method was employed for determining functional groups this is represented in Table 1. This Table displays all of the parts for three curve (a), (b), (c). Curve (a) relates to Fe3O4 and curve (b) associates to Fe3O4/APTES and curve (c) links to Fe3O4/ APTES/Ga (TCPP) (Figure 3).

natural-products-chemistry-nanoparticles

Figure 3: FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (a), Fe3O4/APTES nanoparticles (b), Fe3O4/APTES/Ga(TCPP) nanoadsorbents (c).

Functional Groups Wavenumber (cm-1)
Fe-O 580 cm-1
Si-O-Si 1115 cm-1
Si-OH 1030 cm-1
N-H stretching vibration 1640 cm-1 and 3445 cm-1
C=H stretching vibration 2862 cm-1 and 2930 cm-1
O=C-N amide group 1687cm-1
C=C stretching vibration 1500cm-1

Table 1: Indicating Functional Groups with Wavenumber (cm-1).

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA): Consider (Table 2), in this study to identify the number of modifiers quantitatively, a TGA thermogram was used. This thermogram was illustrated in weight loss Curve (a) relates to Fe3O4, curve (b) associates to Fe3O4/APTES and curve (c) links to Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) [46]. These data show that Fe3O4/APTES nanoparticles have been modified with metalloporphyrin successfully using a chemical bond. Two important advantages for this experiment were observed. The first advantage was the formation of a chemical bond of metalloporphyrin ligand on the Fe3O4 /APTES nanoparticles, which was physical sorption; the second advantage was the use of an external magnetic field for regenerating the nanosorbant [53-55] this is illustrated in Figure 4.

natural-products-chemistry-Thermogravimetric

Figure 4: Thermogravimetric analysis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (a), Fe3O4/APTES nanoparticles (b), Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanoadsorbents (c).

Fe3O4 Stages
a) Fe3O4 weight loss of 1% oxidation Fe3O4 to Fe2O3
b) Fe3O4/APTES The first weight loss stage was 2% decomposition of APTES
the second weight loss stage was 7% gathering silanol group (OH)
C) Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) The first weight loss stage was 4% missing magnetite humidity
The second weight loss stage was 6% decreasing the APTES layer
The third weight loss stage was 7% decomposition of metalloporphyrin

Table 2: a) Fe3O4 with one stage of weight loss, b) Fe3O4/APTES with two stages of weight loss, c) Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) with three stages of weight loss.

TEM analysis: As shown in Figure 5(a) The black powder is Fe3O4, that is completely clear and pure due to lack of any peaks in 20-30 For γ-Fe2O3 [8] in XRD pattern and Figure 5(b) shows the APTES causes the some of the black powders Fe3O4 gather together and Figure 5(c) depicts the core of dark magnetic nanoparticles is coated with a gray shell. It is shown that magnetic nanoparticles are covered by Ga(TCPP); the magnetic nanoparticles have a spherical shape and the majority of particles are in the size range 40-50 nm.

natural-products-chemistry-TEM-images

Figure 5: TEM images of Fe3O4 (1), Fe3O4/APTES (2), Fe3O4/ APTES/Ga(TCPP) (3).

Optimization of the parameters

Effect of solution pH: Power of Hydrogen (pH) is one of the most important factors in substance adsorption in that suitable pH can raise yield sorption. In this study, pH values in the range between 3-11 were considered to measure the pH. Based on results, the highest fluoride removal percentage with Fe3O4 /APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbent in 95%-96% was seen at pH values in the range between 5-7. At lower pH values the fluoride removal decreased, since the metalloporphyrin complex experienced only minor dementalization during contact with the low pH solution and at higher pH values the fluoride removal also decreased due to the existence of competition between the hydroxyl groups and fluoride ions on active sites of the sorbent [37,42,56,57] are presented in Figure 6.

natural-products-chemistry-removal-efficiency

Figure 6: The pH influence on the removal efficiency of fluoride (amount of adsorbents: 50 mg; fluoride concentration: 10 mg. L-1).

Effect of the adsorbent dosage: It was seen that by raising the amount of adsorbent, fluoride removal was increased, reaching a steady value for 50 mg adsorbent dosage. Using various amounts (10-100 mg) of Fe3O4 /APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbents in fluoride removal achieved 96%. Thus, for all the experiments in this study, the adsorbent dosage was 50 mg [58,59] (Figure 7).

natural-products-chemistry-nanoadsorbent-dosage

Figure 7: Effect of nanoadsorbent dosage on the on-fluoride removal (fluoride concentration: 10 mg L-1, pH of the solution: 5.5, contact time: 30 min).

Effect of the contact time: The time of fluoride removal was considered for the Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbent in 0-60 minutes, which determined the effect of the contact time on the fluoride removal with nanosorbent. It was seen that fluoride removal from the Fe3O4 /APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbents was rapid at 30 min, so there was not a higher percent in the removal of fluoride are presented in Figure 8, in contact time 30 min fluoride removal achieved 93%.

natural-products-chemistry-contact-time

Figure 8: Effect of contact time on the adsorption of fluoride by modified nanoparticles (pH of the solution=5.5; amount of adsorbent=50 mg; fluoride concentration=10 mg. L-1).

Removal of fluoride from spiked sample: The solution of fluoride with 10 mg/L concentration was spiked with deionized water. The adsorption experiment was done on 10 mL of this spiked sample under optimal condition (contact time, 30 min, pH 5.5, and Fe3O4/ APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbent 50 mg). It was seen that fluoride content decreased from 10.0 mg/L to 0.3 mg/L (97.0 ± 0.7%).

Effect of co-existing anions: Wastewater has many ions with different concentration which depends on their source. The presence of these ions may have an effect on the extraction efficiency of Fe3O4/ APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbents because of competition for binding with active sites between fluoride ions and foreign ions. The presence of other ions may interfere in the indicated fluoride adsorption; for this reason, the effect of foreign ions in fluoride removal has been studied. Some of the co-existing anion SO42-, NO3-, NO2-, Cl- were investigated (the concentration of every anion was 10 mg/L) Because the tolerance range was defined at ± 5%, and the presence of anions had no notable effect on the fluoride removal efficiency in solution, it is possible for Ga (III) porphyrin complexes to form selective bonds with fluoride [60].

Regeneration of the used sorbent: Regeneration is very important in the development of an economic process. In this study, NaOH solution was selected for regeneration Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanosorbent from fluoride ions. The concentration obtained by using NaOH 10.0 mM solution after optimizing was 98%, indicated the highest recovery of fluoride ions from the adsorbents (Figure 9).

natural-products-chemistry-recovery-percentage

Figure 9: The effect of NaOH concentration as desorbing eluent on the recovery percentage of fluoride ion.

Removal of fluoride from real sample: A sample was selected from wastewater released by the glass industry (Kaveh glass industry group, Saveh, Iran) as can be seen from Table 3. A comparison was performed between fluoride removal efficiency of the proposed nanosorbent with the commercially available activated alumina (KHD-12 from Sumitomo Chemical Co Ltd, Japan). The results show the untreated wastewater had fluoride concentration of 35.5 ± 1.2 mg/L. It has been found that the proposed nanosorbent efficiently removes fluoride from wastewater and decreases the fluoride concentration to 2.8 ± 0.03 mg/L which was fairly the same as the commercial one (2.5 ± 0.08 mg/L), showing that the proposed nanosorbent can be exploited for defluoridation in real field condition.

Parameter Value(mgL-1)
Chloride 228 ± 19
Fluoride 35.5 ± 1.2
Nitrate 8.52 ± 0.6
Sulphate 108 ± 15
Bromide 0.06 ± 0.004
Nitrite 0.12 ± 0.006

Table 3: The characteristics of glass industrial wastewater used in this study.

Reusability of the recycled sorbent: Regeneration and recovery can be considered important factors for evaluating the effect of efficiency. After the first regeneration, this process was continued for five cycles. In this study, the fluoride removal efficiency of the Fe3O4/APTES/Ga (TCPP) nanoadsorbents from five cycles were 97.2%, 96.8%, 95.5%, 94.3%, and 87.0% respectively. It was observed that modified nanoparticles can regenerate and be used more than once, providing an economic advantage for this experiment.

Conclusion

This technique has been done in controlling the concentration of fluoride in water problems at mining operation that it effects on the environment that it is one of the remarkable targets mine water and the environment. Fluoride pollution of the industrial wastewaters is one of the significant problems worldwide imposing a serious threat to human health. Magnetite nanoparticles were modified by grafting Ga(TCPP) groups at the surface of Fe3O4/APTES, and their ability to extract fluoride ions from aqueous solutions was evaluated. This study indicates that magnetite nanoparticles show good efficiency in removing fluoride ions and they can be selective for target anions. The results also indicate that magnetite nanoparticles can be used interchangeably as magnetic Ionics, with the ability to separate fluoride ions from other liquid solution. The pH efficiency and presence of other ions were also investigated for removal efficiency. Two main advantages of the nanomaterial produced are ease of removal from the magnetic field and the possibility for easy regeneration after washing the fluoride ion with alkaline solution. Regeneration of the fluoride Ion and the feasibility for reuse are other advantages of this method.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Research Institute of Petroleum Industry for their help with this study.

References

  1. Zhang T, Li Q, Liu Y, Duan Y, Zhang W (2011) Equilibrium and kinetic studies of fluoride ions adsorption on CeO2/Al2O3 composite pretreated with non-thermal plasma. Chem Eng J 168: 665-671.
  2. Kamga ET, Alonzo V, Nijiki CP, Audebrand N, Ngameni E, et al. (2010) Preparation and characterization of charcoals that contain dispersed Al2O3 as adsorbent for removal of fluoride from drinking water, carbon 48: 333-343.
  3. Turner BD, Binning P, Stipp SL S (2005) Fluoride removal by calcide: evidence for fluoride precipitation and surface adsorption. Environ Sci Technol 30: 9561-9568.
  4. Islam M, Mishra PC, Patel R (2011) Fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution by hybrid thorium phosphate composite. Chem Eng J 166: 978-985.
  5. Samatya S, Mijuki H, Ito Y, Kawakita H, Uezu K (2010) The effect of polystyrene as a progen on the fluoride ion sorption of Zr4+- surface immobilized resin. React Funct Polym 70: 63-68.
  6. Sujana MG, Thakur SB, Rao SB (1998) Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using alum sludge. J Collo Interf Sci 206: 94-101.
  7. Wolkersdorfer CH (2005) Mine water tracer as a basis for remediation. Chemie der Erde 65: 65-74.
  8. Yamaura M, Camilo RL, Sampaio LC, Macêdo MA, Nakamura M (2004) Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane-coated magnetite nanoparticles. J Magnet Magn Mat 279: 210-217.
  9. Joshi SV, Mehta SH, Rao AP, Rao AV (1992) Estimation of sodium fluoride using HPLC in reverse osmosis experiments. Water treatm 7: 207-210
  10. Tahaikt M, El Habbani R, Ait Haddou A, Achary I, Amor Z, et al. (2007) Fluoride removal from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalin 212: 46-53.
  11. Adhikary SK, Tipnis UK, Harkare WP, Govindan KP (1989) Defluoridation during desalination of brackish water by electrodialysis. Desalin 71: 301-312.
  12. Hichour M, Persin F, Sandeaux J, Gavach C (1999) Fluoride removal from waters by Donnan dialysis. Separa and Purific Technol 18: 1-11.
  13. Karthikeyan G, Sundar Raj AS, Meenakshi S, Elango KP (2004) Adsorption dynamics and the effect of temperature of fluoride at alumina-solution interface. J Indian Chem Soc 81: 461-466.
  14. Meenakshi S, Viswanathan N (2007) Identification of selective ion-exchange resin for fluoride sorption. J Coll Interf Sci 308: 438-450.
  15. Bhargava DS, Killedar DJ (1992) Fluoride adsorption on fishbone charcoal through a moving media adsorber. Water Res 26: 781-788.
  16. Venkata Mohan S, Ramanaiah SV, Rajkumar B, Sarma PN (2007) Biosorption of fluoride from aqueous phase onto algal Spirogyra IO1 and evaluation of adsorption kinetics. Biores Technol 98: 1006-1011.
  17. Bühlmann P, Pretsch E, Bakker E (1998) Carrier-based ionselective electrodes and bulk optodes 2-Ionophores for Potentiometric and Optical Sensors. Chem Rev 98: 1593-1688.
  18. Park SB (1992) Mechanistic and Analytical Studies of Metalloporphyrin-Based Anion- Selective Electrodes. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  19. Valiotti AB, Shumilova GI, Druzina ZE (1997) Anion-selective electrodes based on gallium tetraphenylporphine. Russian J Gen Chem 67: 495-498.
  20. Li P, Miser DE, Rabiei S, Yadav RT, Hajaligol MR (2003) The removal of carbon monoxide by iron oxide nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environ 43: 151-162.
  21. Mak SY, Chen DH (2004) Fast adsorption of methylene blue on polyacrylic acid-bound iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Dyes Pigme 61: 93-98.
  22. Uheida A, Salazar-Alvarez G, Björkman E, Yu Z, Muhammed M (2006) Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for the adsorption of Co2+ from aqueous solution. J Colloid Interf Sci 298: 501-507.
  23. Mayo JT, Yavuz C, Yean S, Cong L, Shipley H, et al. (2007) The effect of nanocrystalline magnetite size on arsenic removal. Sci Technol Adv Mat 8: 71-75.
  24. Blaney LM, Cinar S, SenGupta AK (2007) Hybrid anion exchanger for trace phosphate removal from water and wastewater. Water Res 41: 1603-1613.
  25. Hristovski K, Westerhoff P, Möller T, Sylvester P, Condit W (2008) Simultaneous removal of perchlorate and arsenate by ion-exchange media modified with nanostructured iron (hydr)oxide. J Hazard Mat 152: 397-406.
  26. Teunissen W, Bol AA, Geus JW (1999) Magnetic catalyst bodies. Cataly Today 48: 329-336.
  27. Yoon TJ, Lee W, Oh YS, Lee JK (2003) Magnetic nanoparticles as a catalyst vehicle for simple and easy recycling. New J Chem 27: 227-229.
  28. Stevens PD, Li G, Fan J, Yen M, Gao Y (2005) Recycling of homogeneous Pd catalysts using superparamagnetic nanoparticles as novel soluble supports for Suzuki, Heck, and Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions. Chem Communica, pp: 4435-4437.
  29. Lee D, Lee J, Lee H, Jin S, Hyeon T (2006) Filtration-free recyclable catalytic asymmetric dihydroxylation using a ligand immobilized on magnetic mesocellular mesoporous silica. Adv Synth and Cataly 348: 41-46.
  30. Ó Dálaigh C, Corr SA, Gun'ko Y, Connon SJ (2007) A magneticnanoparticle-supported 4-N, N-dialkylaminopyridine catalyst: Excellent reactivity combined with facile catalyst recovery and recyclability. Angewandte Chemie 119: 4407-4410.
  31. Yoon H, Ko S, Jang J (2007) Nitrogen-doped magnetic carbon nanoparticles as catalyst supports for efficient recovery and recycling. Chem Commun, pp: 1468-1470.
  32. Zhang Y, Li Z, Sun W, Xia C (2008) A magnetically recyclable heterogeneous catalyst: Cobalt nanooxide supported on hydroxyapatiteencapsulated γ-Fe2O3 nanocrystallites for highly efficient olefin oxidation with H2O2. Cataly Communica 10: 237-242.
  33. Seiler K, Simon W (1992) Theoretical aspects of bulk optode membranes. Analytica Chimica Acta 266: 73-87.
  34. Gupta VK, Jain AK, Singh LP, Khurana U (1997) Porphyrins as carrier in PVC based membrane potentiometric sensors for nickel(II). Analytica Chimica Acta 355: 33-41.
  35. Legin AV, Rudnitskaya AM, Vlasov YG, Di Natale C, D’Amico A (1999) The features of the electronic tongue in comparison with the characteristics of the discrete ion-selective sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chem 58: 464-468.
  36. Sadeghi S, Shamsipur M (2000) Lead(II)-selective membrane electrode based on tetraphenylporphyrin. Analy Lett 33: 17-28.
  37. Steinle ED, Amemiya S, Bühlmann P, Meyerhoff ME (2000) Origin of Non-Nernstian anion response slopes of metalloporphyrin-based liquid/polymer membrane electrodes. Analy Chem 72: 5766-5773.
  38. Biesaga M, Pyrzyńska K, Trojanowicz M (2000) Porphyrins in analytical chemistry-A review. Talanta 51: 209-224.
  39. Malinowska E, Niedziółka J, Meyerhoff ME (2001) Potentiometric and spectroscopic characterization of anion selective electrodes based on metal(III) porphyrin ionophores in polyurethane membranes. Analytica Chimica Acta 432: 67-78.
  40. Gupta VK, Kumar A, Mangla R (2001) Protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester as active material in PVC matrix membranes for the fabrication of zinc(II) selective sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chem 76: 617-623.
  41. Zhang W, Rozniecka E, Malinowska E, Parzuchowski P, Meyerhoff ME (2002) Optical chloride sensor based on dimer−monomer equilibrium of indium(III) octaethylporphyrin in polymeric film. Analy Chem 74: 4548-4557.
  42. Malinowska E, Górski Ł, Meyerhoff ME (2002) Zirconium(IV)-porphyrins as novel ionophores for fluoride-selective polymeric membrane electrodes. Analytica Chimica Acta 468: 133-141.
  43. Górski Ł, Malinowska E (2005) Fluoride-selective sensors based on polyurethane membranes doped with Zr(IV)-porphyrins. Analytica Chimica Acta 540: 159-165.
  44. Iwado A, Mifune M, Hazawa T, Mukuno T, Oda J (1999) Peroxidase-like activity of ion exchange resins modified with metalporphine in fluorescent flow injection analysis. Analy Sci 15: 841-846.
  45. Mifune M, Sugimoto K, Iwado A, Akizawa H, Motohashi N, et al. (2003) Flow injection analysis of hydrogen peroxide using glass-beads modified with manganese(III)-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine derivative and its analytical application to the determination of serum glucose. Analy Sci 19: 569-573.
  46. Poursaberi T, Hassanisadi M, Torkestani M, Zare M (2012) Development of Zirconium (IV) metalloporphyrin grafted Fe3O4 nanoparticles for efficient fluoride removal. Chem Eng J 189-190: 117-125.
  47. Maity D, Agrawal DC (2007) Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles under oxidizing environment and their stabilization in aqueous and non-aqueous media. J Magne Magnet Mat 308: 46-55.
  48. Ozmen M, Can K, Arslan G, Tor A, Cengeloglu Y, et al (2010) Adsorption of Cu(II) from aqueous solution by using modified Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Desalin 254: 162-169.
  49. Sayin S, Ozcan F, Yilmaz M (2010) Synthesis and evaluation of chromate and arsenate anions extraction ability of a N-methylglucamine derivative of calix [4] arene immobilized onto magnetic nanoparticles. J Hazard Mat 178: 312-319.
  50. Sun L, Zhang C, Chen, Liu J, Jin H, et al. (2009) Preparation of alumina-coated magnetite nanoparticle for extraction of trimethoprim from environmental water samples based on mixed hemimicelles solid-phase extraction. Analytica Chimica Acta 638: 162-168.
  51. Changfu Z, Xuexin T, Dong W, Aiqing X, Wenhui L (2009) An unsymmetrical porphyrin and its metal complexes: Synthesis, spectroscopy, thermal analysis and liquid crystal properties. J Serbian Chem Soc 74: 1097-1104.
  52. Porra RJ, Ross BD (1964) Haem synthase and cobalt porphyrin synthase in various micro-organisms. Biochem J 94: 557-562.
  53. Cai JH, Huang JW, Zhao P, Ye YJ, Yu HC (2009) Silica metalloporphyrins hybrid materials: preparation and catalysis to hydroxylate cyclohexane with molecular oxygen. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 50: 430-436.
  54. Espinosa M, Terres E, Pacheco S, Mejia R, Rodriguez R (2010) Sol-gel synthesis and characterization of SBA-15 in presence of metalloporphyrins: m-5,10,15,20 TPP-Ni2+, Etio-III-Ni2+ and Etio-III-VO2+. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 53: 239-245.
  55. Kosal ME, Suslick KS (2000) Microporous porphyrin and metalloporphyrin materials. J Solid State Chem 152: 87-98.
  56. Mitchell-Koch JT, Pietrzak M, Malinowska E, Meyerhoff ME (2006) Aluminum(III) porphyrins as ionophores for fluoride selective polymeric membrane electrodes. Electroanal 18: 551-557.
  57. Kang Y, Lutz C, Hong SA, Sung D, Lee JS, et al. (2010) Development of a fluoride-selective electrode based on scandium(III) octaethylporphyrin in a plasticized polymeric membrane.Bulletin of the Korean Chem Soc 31: 1601-1608.
  58. Biswas K, Gupta K, Goswami A, Ghosh UC (2010) Fluoride removal efficiency from aqueous solution by synthetic iron(III)-aluminum(III)-chromium(III) ternary mixed oxide. Desalin 255: 44-51.
  59. Van Caneghem J, Block C, Vandecasteele C (2010) Assessment of the impact on human health of industrial emissions to air: Does the result depend on the applied method. J Hazard Mat 184: 788-797.
  60. Pimenta AM, Araújo AN, Montenegro MCBSM, Pasquini C, Rohwedder JJR, et al. (2004) Chloride-selective membrane electrodes and optodes based on an indium(III) porphyrin for the determination of chloride in a sequential injection analysis system. J Pharmac Biomed Analy 36: 49-55.
Citation: Asgari B, Bowen J (2017) Gallium (III)-Metalloporphyrin Grafted Magnetite Nanoparticles for Fluoride Removal from Aqueous Solutions. Nat Prod Chem Res 5: 282.

Copyright: © 2017 Asgari B, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.